Micro CoGen.

Fuels/alternatives => Bio-Diesel => Topic started by: LowGear on June 19, 2011, 01:50:29 PM

Title: Switching Between Fuel Tanks and Web Sites
Post by: LowGear on June 19, 2011, 01:50:29 PM
Hi,

I'm going to be converting my diesel truck over to WVO and Diesel or BioDiesel.  I'll need some help with design and strategy.  I'd like you to help me find a good site - like this one - to source such questions as:

Is it proper to run both fuels through the same filters (the truck already uses two factory filters).

Is it proper to heat both fuels? 

Do you recommend heating the WVO prior or after filtering?

Casey
Title: Re: Switching Between Fuel Tanks and Web Sites
Post by: WStayton on June 19, 2011, 08:07:05 PM
LowGear;

  I would guess that a lot depends on how filtered your WVO is before it gets to your vehicle.

  If your run it through a centrifuge and then finish it up by running it through a 2 or 3 micron filter, the only thing that you are going to have in the WVO when you put it in your vehicle is, maybe, some high(er) melting point HC's that fall out of solution in the WVO and gum everything up.  For these you would want to use heat in the sytem as soon as you can get it to the WVO, like in the tank!

  From a standpoint of performance through the injectors, most (!) diesel engines will have less problems if you heat the injectors and/or heat the WVO just before it gets to the injectors.

  Take what I say with a grain of salt, since my knowledge is ALL empircal, at this point (haven't burned the first liter/gallon of WVO in anything, YET!  <grin>) and most of the knowledge I have picked up is with respect to Mercedes OM616 and OM617 diesels which seem to be relatively WVO friendly, in that they have an injection pump that isn't real fussy about what is going through it, so long as it is some where near the right viscosity. 

  I have seen picture of Mercedes injector running in free air (i.e. not in an engine) and the differance in spray pattern with 50 degree WVO and 190 degree WVO was VASTLY different.  Nice spray pattern at 190 degreesand lopsided squirts/dribbles with the 50 degree stuff, through the same injector.  So, I believe that, at least in free air, there is a vast differance in spray pattern depending on temperature.

  If, on the other hand, you just filter the WVO through a sock and then dump it in to your vehicle, you need lots of filtering capacity, preferably heated (so that it doesn't get clogged with wax that falls out of the WVO) before the WVO get to the existing vehicle filters!

  As usual, your YMMV!

  The above is worth exactly what you paid for it!

Regards,

Wayne Stayton
Title: Re: Switching Between Fuel Tanks and Web Sites
Post by: bschwartz on June 19, 2011, 08:41:24 PM
I have about 40,000 miles or more on WVO.  I have run it in my mercedes (as wayne says, they are very forgiving) and in a'95 GMC Suburban 6.5 (also an IDI motor).

The first and MOST important question, is what is the vehicle?

This is the first forum I would frequent if I were a first timer.
http://biodiesel.infopop.cc/eve/forums
Title: Re: Switching Between Fuel Tanks and Web Sites
Post by: LowGear on June 20, 2011, 12:30:25 AM
Aloha bschwartz and Wayne,

Veggie and a couple of other well intentioned members have me building a better than average WVO processing station.  It will be a heated centrifuge tank system.  It won't be quite as cutting edge as theirs but far better than my previous plan.

Unfortunately I have a 1986 Isuzu NPR.  I write "Unfortunately" as NPR only produced IDI engines from about 92 until 97 as I currently recall.  When this 86 gives up I'll pick-up one of the 95 or 96 chassis that have disk brakes and low cut windows.  Back when I was sleeping with a 283 Chevy I would have never guessed I'd end up favoring this dump truck over all my other toys tools of capital production.

I've slopped some 10 micron WVO into Izzy but until I have the finer stuff out of the new processor that will not happen again.  Once I have the <5 micron VO I'll start blending it with diesel at around 40%.  It never gets below 65 in my part of paradise just in case your wondering.

I'll cruse the site mentioned above and look forward to other references.  This last electrical bill came in at 42 cents a KWH.  The Witte will know the taste of WVO and Bio Diesel as well.  Projects Rule!

Keep up the good work.

Casey
Title: Re: Switching Between Fuel Tanks and Web Sites
Post by: bschwartz on June 20, 2011, 07:19:02 AM
Casey,

To answer some of your questions more directly.....

Is it proper to run both fuels through the same filters (the truck already uses two factory filters).

   I would use separate filters.  If one clogs, you can use the other fuel source, and purge times are much shorter.

Is it proper to heat both fuels? 

   I do.  I don't know the fuel injection system on your NPR, but on my 6.5, the rotary pump isn't known for being the strongest.  My thinking is that by heating BOTH fuels before the injection pump, when I switch fuel sources, there is no thermal shock as they are both the same temperature (around 185 F).  There is some concern about new low sulfur diesel not being as good a lubricant when heated.  My solution to that problem is to add about 5% WVO to my diesel tank.  The WVO tank remains 100%.

Do you recommend heating the WVO prior or after filtering?

   If you mean the fuel that is in the vehicle, I say YES.  Even my best cleanest oil sometimes gets a little bit of thicker oils/fats that get in the mix.  Although it is all clean and will burn well in the engine, until it is heated, it can potentially be thick enough to clog filters.  If the filters are heated, or the fuel is heated before entering the filter, that problem can be reduced or eliminated completely.


I hope some of this opinion is helpful.

Good luck with the project,
-Brett
Title: Re: Switching Between Fuel Tanks and Web Sites
Post by: LowGear on June 20, 2011, 09:04:13 AM
Aloha Brett,

40,000 successful miles tells me just about everything I need to know.  The more I learn about WVO the more I understand about factory diesel.  Its beginning to look like I'll need to know a lot more about the fuel system on the NPR.  The knowledge should transfer to the Witte generator.

A fellow on CL wants $110 for two 3 port solenoid valves.  Good deal?

Casey
Title: Re: Switching Between Fuel Tanks and Web Sites
Post by: bschwartz on June 20, 2011, 10:33:45 AM
that being a good price depends on what brand and model the valves are .
Title: Re: Switching Between Fuel Tanks and Web Sites
Post by: LowGear on June 20, 2011, 04:20:52 PM
Hi,

This first link is to the valves in Hawaii.  This seller just phoned me back and has converted half a dozen trucks for his employer and the first one was five years ago.  I will be visiting him soon after I return to paradise in July.

http://honolulu.craigslist.org/big/pts/2427379548.html (http://honolulu.craigslist.org/big/pts/2427379548.html)

Another valve I saw on eBay looks real interesting to me as well.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=260803223392&viewitem=&sspagename=STRK%3AMEWAX%3AIT (http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=260803223392&viewitem=&sspagename=STRK%3AMEWAX%3AIT)

The fellow in Hawaii mentioned they had tried the motor drive valves which resulted in complications but I don't know if they were even the same manufacture much more model.

This link has a pretty down to earth schematic.  You have to page down to view it.

http://www.wvodesigns.com/wiki/Mercedes_Conversion (http://www.wvodesigns.com/wiki/Mercedes_Conversion)

I found it curious that the diesel line was left to return all the way to the tank while the WVO was back-fed to the heated filter?

The current plan is to strip the tank, gauge sending assembly and filters (three if you include the water separator) from another NPR.  Finding small NPR tanks is difficult so I may have to have a larger tank split into two side by side tanks but still go with second gauge sending assembly and filters. 

Do people ever run a copper fuel line up the exhaust pipe for a few feet to harvest heat for the WVO tank? 

Casey
Title: Re: Switching Between Fuel Tanks and Web Sites
Post by: bschwartz on June 20, 2011, 05:45:27 PM
The looped return for WVO is common, although not without it's problems.
The theory is to return already heated fuel to the filter, which helps keep the heat localized.
The only problem I've seen with that setup is if air gets into the line, there is no where for it to go....

The local valves look like they would do the job as long as the ports have a common thread size for screwing in nipples (go ahead and throw your comments in....).

I would not recommend copper lines, as they can react with the WVO causing polymerization issues.  I've had good success with aluminum lines.  I haven't wrapped the aluminum around the exhaust, but I don't see any reason it wouldn't work.

Title: Re: Switching Between Fuel Tanks and Web Sites
Post by: LowGear on June 20, 2011, 07:39:04 PM
Air in the lines.  I've seen automatic bleeders in water lines.  Is there such a thing as an auto bleeder for fuel lines?

Copper lines causing problems.  So that's why I see so many fancy lines or brass. 

I was thinking more of putting the (now) aluminum line inside the exhaust pipe on its way up to the engine area.

Casey
Title: Re: Switching Between Fuel Tanks and Web Sites
Post by: bschwartz on June 20, 2011, 09:37:19 PM
I've never seen an auto bleeder for fuel lines, as bubbles would usually just pass through to the return to tank line.  I wouldn't recommend putting the aluminum lines IN the exhaust.  I would imagine that corrosion would kill your lines in quick manor.

I would suggest either along side the exhaust, or use a Hose In Hose arrangement with coolant lines.
Title: Re: Switching Between Fuel Tanks and Web Sites
Post by: Geno on June 21, 2011, 04:45:14 AM
I've got about 10,000 WVO miles on my 1985 300D. I did a summer only conversion and use the same filter for WVO and diesel. It has manual valves in the trunk with the WVO tank. The WVO is returned to the tank. My 10 plate FPHE gets the oil plenty hot enough for the filter and IP. After an hour the WVO tank gets up to 125°f or so. There is a lot or return fuel on these old MB's. I have heated injector lines as well and they get the fuel up to 160-180°f. The car gives me plenty of warning when it wants a new filter and it's a 10 minute job. Timing the purge is easy with a clear fuel filter on the return line in the trunk. I didn't follow some of the standard rules as Brett has outlined but so far so good. The up side is it's real clean under the hood. Very little plumbing or wiring and no heated filters or valves. Also, when running on diesel the only place WVO sits is in the WVO tank.

http://www.genedevera.com/temp/mb/index.htm

Thanks, Geno
Title: Re: Switching Between Fuel Tanks and Web Sites
Post by: mike90045 on June 21, 2011, 07:48:01 AM
Quote from: Geno on June 21, 2011, 04:45:14 AM
I've got about 10,000 WVO miles on my 1985 300D. I did a summer only conversion and use the same filter for WVO and diesel. It has manual valves in the trunk with the WVO tank. The WVO is returned to the tank. My 10 plate FPHE gets the oil plenty hot enough for the filter and IP. After an hour the WVO tank gets up to 125°f or so. There is a lot or return fuel on these old MB's. I have heated injector lines as well and they get the fuel up to 160-180°f. The car gives me plenty of warning when it wants a new filter and it's a 10 minute job. Timing the purge is easy with a clear fuel filter on the return line in the trunk. I didn't follow some of the standard rules as Brett has outlined but so far so good. The up side is it's real clean under the hood. Very little plumbing or wiring and no heated filters or valves. Also, when running on diesel the only place WVO sits is in the WVO tank.
  http://www.genedevera.com/temp/mb/index.htm
Thanks, Geno

I'd be a bit concerned about the RUG you mix into the WVO, if your return line heats your WVO tank up that much.  RUG is going to want to vaporize, and go somewhere.  I'm glad you switched to diesel mix.    Nice job on it all.
Title: Re: Switching Between Fuel Tanks and Web Sites
Post by: bschwartz on June 21, 2011, 11:42:43 AM
Ahhh, but the RUG would vaporize in the tank pressurizing it.  That would eliminate the need for a fuel pump  ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Switching Between Fuel Tanks and Web Sites
Post by: LowGear on June 21, 2011, 12:41:18 PM
Keep It Simple Smarty!

I must have been channeling your design when I started twilighting the two tank approach on my truck.  As I've mentioned it never gets below 65 here and 70 is the common early morning temperature so you're system is pretty exciting.  The real downside is I don't have the miraculous Mercedes IDI 80's engine.  And for that reason I'll be reading Brett's contribution many times.

Like heating the WVO as it comes out of the tank so that it is hot (very warm) when it hits the filters.  A complete set of separate filters is a pretty steep curve but pre heating for sure on the WVO line.

Both of you recommend or use an additional pump on or near the WVO tank.  I wonder if one of those in-tank pumps would be a sensible idea.  OK, a plausible idea.  It would save an external mount and provide physical security for the pump.  How about something like in a Toyota RUG powered truck tank?  I use the truck on a farm and drive through bushes once in a while.

I need to call Matt at Universal Welding to see how much splitting a round fuel tank into two sections would be?  200 miles is a road trip for me.

Let's keep those little gray cells cooking.

Casey



Title: Re: Switching Between Fuel Tanks and Web Sites
Post by: bschwartz on June 21, 2011, 05:33:19 PM
I would NEVER put a pump in the tank.  If there is a problem..... well you get the picture.
I use a Walbro bellows pump on my Suburban.  It runs about 10 PSI and cycles on demand. 
http://www.fuel-pumps.net/frb51.html

You mention a "complete set of filters..."
If your filter fine enough before you fill your tank, then an on board filter is only to catch dirt and stuff that gets into the tank while filling.  As such, any type of filter should be sufficient.  I'd mount a diesel filter from what ever is convenient to get replacement filters for.  On my listeroid, I use a mercedes housing like this.
http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d149/tonywestoz/300TD%20Inspection/Picture016.jpg
It uses an easy to change screw on filter.  If your truck needs more flow, then just find a housing from a larger diesel engine.

As your temperature never gets below 65, you may not need much in the way of heating prior to the filter.

Once the engine is up to full operating temperature, as long as the fuel is hot enough before getting to the IP, then the injectors, you are good. 
Title: Re: Switching Between Fuel Tanks and Web Sites
Post by: WStayton on June 21, 2011, 08:14:44 PM
Hi Guys!

  I'll second (third?) the reservations to use copper line for any sort of diesel fuel and/or WVO.  It seems like the fuel takes serious exception to the copper line and grows green "fur" all over the inside of the copper line.  AND, it seems like anything with copper in the mix (brass, bronze, . . .) has more, or less, the same problem.

  I have also read of some problems with aluminum lines and diesel fuel - it seems like, if it is used in a high pressure line, especially, it gets work hardened and then splits wide open - guaranteed to ruin your drive to Church on Sunday! <grin>  (Though there MIGHT be some biblical language present!)

Low Gear:

  Why don't you just solve your non-indirect-injection problems by dropping a OM616 2.4 liter four cylinder into your vehicle?  They seem to be commoner than dirt and nearly as cheap - you could just about guarantee that you wouldn't have any fuel problems if you used well filtered WVO in a Mercedes OM616/617 engine.

  Which brings me to another issue - the experience with Mercedes engines seems to be that they will run a long time on WVO or very moderate mixes of WVO and Dino-Diesel - BUT, they don't run nearly as long, without having problems, on WVO as they do on straight Dino-Diesel.  Many of them are running around with over a hundred thousand miles on the clock and they have never had the injectors out of them!  With WVO, the experience seems to be more like half of that (i.e. 50,000 miles) and you need to take out the injectors and clean them and check their flow patterns and the pressure at which they open - and, lots of guys who run WVO in Mercedes OM616/617 advocate using a slightly higher "pop" pressure than is standard - not sure how that applys to your vehicle, but the feeling seems to be that a slightly higher pressure makes the spray pattern better at marginal temperatures - like when you have just started up and switch over to WVO before everything is fully hot - of course this is with the Bosch inline injection pumps which seem to be almost indestructable, so they don't mind a couple hundred more psi - not sure if your single plunger, a la Lucas, pump will be as forgiving.

  As always, YMMV - the forgoing is worth exactly what you paid for it!  <grin>

Regardz,

Wayne Stayton
Title: Re: Switching Between Fuel Tanks and Web Sites
Post by: LowGear on June 21, 2011, 11:33:55 PM
Hi Brett,

QuoteI would NEVER put a pump in the tank.  If there is a problem...
You need to remember the fuel tanks on this rig hang off the frame rail and are about 2 feet off the floor - see photo.  Not too bad.  I plan to hang the WVO one just behind this one.

Wayne, my brother;

If I weren't occasionally moving eight tons with Izzy up a 35 degree driveway I might consider the Merc engine.  Now if I were converting just about anything else it would be the engine of my choice.  For this unit the upgrade would be the 4BD2TC Isuzu IDI that would bolt right up and give me a good solid 128 HP at 3500 RPM.  But if you hear of another turbo Merc in Washington or Hawaii please let me know cause I'm eyeing dead 4-Runners and Range Rovers (I may not be crazy enough to try a Rover implant but it's a great fantasy cause they be way cool going down the road).

I think I'm covered on the high pressure consideration for the aluminum lines but chances are I'll just strip a second set of lines off another NPR to service the second tank.  I'm still visualizing the line going up the inside of the exhaust on its way to the engine.  I'm also seeing the switching valves to be very close to the tanks and filters.  My photos don't show the two particulate filters and the water catchment gizmo being within a foot of the tank in the photo.

I phoned the welding shop today and a maximum of $200 to put a divider into a long tank making it into two tanks.

Casey

Title: Re: Switching Between Fuel Tanks and Web Sites
Post by: bschwartz on June 22, 2011, 07:14:39 AM
Casey,

"I'm also seeing the switching valves to be very close to the tanks and filters."

The further away from the IP the switching valves are, the longer change over/purge times are.
All the fuel in the line from the valve to the IP has to be used up before the engine starts to use the alternate fuel.  Valving near the tank is useful if both tanks use the same type of fuel, and you are only switching sources.

As for Wayne "I have also read of some problems with aluminum lines and diesel fuel - it seems like, if it is used in a high pressure line, especially, it gets work hardened and then splits wide open"

This would be low pressure line, and not subject to those stresses.  Many racers use aluminum fuel line.  Besides, this is for vegetable oil, not diesel.  ;D
Title: Re: Switching Between Fuel Tanks and Web Sites
Post by: LowGear on June 22, 2011, 02:47:11 PM
Hi Brett,

It's true that the primary purpose of the second fuel line will be WVO but if things get tight a load of diesel of bio-diesel just might end up in that tank and associated lines.  I think your reminder of low pressure and use time are entirely on my side.  I put darn near 3000 miles on this unit last year.  If you're thinking cost reflectivity then let me advise you that this is a war against the oil cartels.  Wars are not normally cost effective.

I've just re-listed my CL ads seeking a second NPR tank.  I know where one is with everything but it would mean shipping it to Kona.  $160 for a 2' X 2' X 4' box - weight not too important.

Casey
Title: Re: Switching Between Fuel Tanks and Web Sites
Post by: fuelfarmer on June 23, 2011, 06:55:19 AM
QuoteIf you're thinking cost reflectivity then let me advise you that this is a war against the oil cartels.  Wars are not normally cost effective.

What a true statement. That is the best description of alternative energy I have ever heard. But I still think I can beat the odds on cost. ;D
Title: Re: Switching Between Fuel Tanks and Web Sites
Post by: bschwartz on June 23, 2011, 07:10:15 AM
My comments were not meant as a cost issue at all.  Simply that if your valves are too far away from your IP, it will take a long time to switch fuels...... ie. you will need to switch off the WVO to diesel  5 miles from your ending destination instead of 1/2 mile.  This may not be a big problem, until you forget to change before getting to your destination.  Then you'd need to idle the truck for 20 minutes to get all of the WVO out of the injection system before shutdown to assure that there is diesel in the lines for the next start.

I am also a strong believer in " this is a war against the oil cartels"
Title: Re: Switching Between Fuel Tanks and Web Sites
Post by: WStayton on June 23, 2011, 07:59:27 AM
bschwartz

   A slight nit pick here . . .

  You say:  "  Besides, this is for vegetable oil, not diesel. "

  I think that the work hardening of the aluminum is not a function of what you use to pressureize it.  Be it diesel, WVO, gasoline, water, or just about any liquid (except nitro-glycerin, I suppose! <grin>) So, I don't think it matters that it is going to be for WVO instead of pump diesel.

  Having said that, however, you are right, that it is only a consideration in a high pressure (think injection) lines and really not a consideration here, where the line is for very low pressure fuel transfer.  It was my mistake to insert that issue here!  I am just very sensative to this issue having watched my brother replumb his overhauled to new John Deere 720 diesel and then be surprised when his aluminum injection lines a) Didn't perform quite right - due to their large, relative to steel, expansion, and b) They split wide open bringing things to an immediate halt!!!

Regardz,

Wayne Stayton
Title: Re: Switching Between Fuel Tanks and Web Sites
Post by: bschwartz on June 23, 2011, 03:06:43 PM
Wayne, I was kidding about the WVO/diesel thing.

This I why I hate forums/email etc. instead of real conversations.  It would have come across clearly as a joke if you could have heard me instead of reading it....

Oh well....  :)
Title: Re: Switching Between Fuel Tanks and Web Sites
Post by: LowGear on June 23, 2011, 04:08:50 PM
I expect a certain amount of cross contamination if that is the right word.  Thats why I inquired about the line loop in the schematic vs: the full return to the tank.  I think you see I'm still flirting with using the same filter system for both fuel sources.

Latest fuel in the tank heating flash.  The tanks are steel.  I'm thinking about directing the exhaust across the bottom of the WVO tank.  Too cleaver for my own good?

Casey
Title: Re: Switching Between Fuel Tanks and Web Sites
Post by: WStayton on June 23, 2011, 04:27:01 PM
LowGear;

  Umm, err, . . . maybe you should leave an openable/ accessable hatch on the WVO side of things, then you can just fry french-fries in your WVO as you motor along!  <grin>

  Okay, I was/am kidding - but it was an interesting thought! <smile>

Regardz,

Wayne Stayton
Title: Re: Switching Between Fuel Tanks and Web Sites
Post by: Geno on June 23, 2011, 04:50:44 PM
Casey, in your climate heating the tank is probably not a major concern. If you get the oil hot before it hits the filters, fuel pump, IP and even hotter before injection you'll probably be fine. This depends on the quality of the oil as well, PHO will need a tank heated to at least 100°f.

Brett has a perfectly good point about purge times when the valves are near the tank instead of the engine bay but if you don't use the truck for a lot of short runs it's not much of a hassle. When I use my Benz it's most often for a 200 mile run to see family or friends. If I use it for picking up stuff in town I just leave it on diesel. I believe a lot of the questions a person has about their conversion depends on their own personal needs.


Thanks, Geno
Title: Re: Switching Between Fuel Tanks and Web Sites
Post by: LowGear on June 23, 2011, 08:55:30 PM
Geeezze,

PHO?

I had pho for lunch.  What's this PHO mean?

Casey

Minds; Waste em if you've got em.
Title: Re: Switching Between Fuel Tanks and Web Sites
Post by: bschwartz on June 23, 2011, 10:07:43 PM
Partially hydrogenated oil